<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CPSC Denies Lead Test Reliability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2007/10/cpsc-denies-lea.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2007/10/cpsc-denies-lea.html</link>
	<description>A dad's eye view of baby and toddler stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:34:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2007/10/cpsc-denies-lea.html/comment-page-1#comment-3615</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 06:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s54748.gridserver.com/baby/2007/10/cpsc-denies-lead-test-reliability.html#comment-3615</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Consumer Reports is in the business of casting a critical eye on consumer products. In other words, they make many companies very angry on a regular basis. CR has its work picked over with a fine tooth comb. I&#039;m surprised such &quot;errors&quot; as the car seat testing aren&#039;t in the news more often. It&#039;s a testament to their reliability.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll be giving serious consideration to the one child car seat that survived CR&#039;s unintentional 70 mph tougher-than-government-standards crash test. I just can&#039;t guarantee the person who hits my car will honor the government&#039;s wish that we all crash our cars at 35 mph. Again, just who is the government looking after with these unrealistic tests? It&#039;s not us.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumer Reports is in the business of casting a critical eye on consumer products. In other words, they make many companies very angry on a regular basis. CR has its work picked over with a fine tooth comb. I&#8217;m surprised such &#8220;errors&#8221; as the car seat testing aren&#8217;t in the news more often. It&#8217;s a testament to their reliability.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be giving serious consideration to the one child car seat that survived CR&#8217;s unintentional 70 mph tougher-than-government-standards crash test. I just can&#8217;t guarantee the person who hits my car will honor the government&#8217;s wish that we all crash our cars at 35 mph. Again, just who is the government looking after with these unrealistic tests? It&#8217;s not us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla</title>
		<link>http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2007/10/cpsc-denies-lea.html/comment-page-1#comment-3614</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 05:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s54748.gridserver.com/baby/2007/10/cpsc-denies-lead-test-reliability.html#comment-3614</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I still have some hesistancy about CR after the whole car seat fiasco.  I realize the did print a retraction but wonder how well thought out some of their testing is as well.  Not that I disagree with your comments about the CPSC.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still have some hesistancy about CR after the whole car seat fiasco.  I realize the did print a retraction but wonder how well thought out some of their testing is as well.  Not that I disagree with your comments about the CPSC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
