<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advice Needed: Compact Digital Cameras</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2006/03/advice_needed_c.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2006/03/advice_needed_c.html</link>
	<description>A dad's eye view of baby and toddler stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:14:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Kim - 21st Century Dad</title>
		<link>http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2006/03/advice_needed_c.html/comment-page-1#comment-5961</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Kim - 21st Century Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 09:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s54748.gridserver.com/baby/2006/03/advice-needed-compact-digital-cameras.html#comment-5961</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I know I&#039;m a little late to the comment party here. Have you found a camera yet?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I find it so hard to use my compact digital camera after getting a DSLR. Our diaper bag is big enough to accommodate a Nikon D80 and a flash unit, and my Little Miss doesn&#039;t go anywhere without the diaper bag anyway.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I had some good luck with Panasonic&#039;s Lumix series. Most have sturdy metal bodies. Some are slim enough to put into your back pocket. They seem to be pretty user-friendly with easy access to the controls you use most. When you pre-focus with a half-press of the shutter, lag is minimal.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I&#8217;m a little late to the comment party here. Have you found a camera yet?</p>
<p>I find it so hard to use my compact digital camera after getting a DSLR. Our diaper bag is big enough to accommodate a Nikon D80 and a flash unit, and my Little Miss doesn&#8217;t go anywhere without the diaper bag anyway.</p>
<p>I had some good luck with Panasonic&#8217;s Lumix series. Most have sturdy metal bodies. Some are slim enough to put into your back pocket. They seem to be pretty user-friendly with easy access to the controls you use most. When you pre-focus with a half-press of the shutter, lag is minimal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2006/03/advice_needed_c.html/comment-page-1#comment-5960</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s54748.gridserver.com/baby/2006/03/advice-needed-compact-digital-cameras.html#comment-5960</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have the Sony W50 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/sony/dsc_w50-review/index.shtml)-&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/sony/dsc_w50-review/index.shtml)-&lt;/a&gt; and I love it!  I had a Canon powershot, liked the photo quality, but found it&#039;s autofocus was just too darn slow for a moving child...we missed too many good shots.  I tried every Canon ultra-small on the market with similar results.  The sony is very small, thin, large screen, and is very fast in high light and mid-light situations.  It&#039;s the best I&#039;ve found in low-light, which is pretty darn good, though not perfect and a little slow, but what can you expect.  There are red-eye issues (it&#039;s too slow with red-eye turned on) but those are a 5-second fix with any photo software now, and are generally an issue with all the ultra-small critters.  Best of all, battery life is beyond phenomenal.  I go about 400+ shots in between battery charges, and charging is fast.  I think it&#039;s been replaced by now with a slightly newer version, so you&#039;ll have to check that one.  There&#039;s a great review site here: www.dcresource.com &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the Sony W50 (<a href="http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/sony/dsc_w50-review/index.shtml)-" rel="nofollow">http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/sony/dsc_w50-review/index.shtml)-</a> and I love it!  I had a Canon powershot, liked the photo quality, but found it&#8217;s autofocus was just too darn slow for a moving child&#8230;we missed too many good shots.  I tried every Canon ultra-small on the market with similar results.  The sony is very small, thin, large screen, and is very fast in high light and mid-light situations.  It&#8217;s the best I&#8217;ve found in low-light, which is pretty darn good, though not perfect and a little slow, but what can you expect.  There are red-eye issues (it&#8217;s too slow with red-eye turned on) but those are a 5-second fix with any photo software now, and are generally an issue with all the ultra-small critters.  Best of all, battery life is beyond phenomenal.  I go about 400+ shots in between battery charges, and charging is fast.  I think it&#8217;s been replaced by now with a slightly newer version, so you&#8217;ll have to check that one.  There&#8217;s a great review site here: <a href="http://www.dcresource.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dcresource.com</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H.A. Page</title>
		<link>http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2006/03/advice_needed_c.html/comment-page-1#comment-5959</link>
		<dc:creator>H.A. Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s54748.gridserver.com/baby/2006/03/advice-needed-compact-digital-cameras.html#comment-5959</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The one I carry in my pocket or purse constantly: PowerShot SD20 Digital Elph, Canon.  Can&#039;t go wrong w/ that one.  Also have another one for more powerful shots but the Canon Elph is too convenient.&lt;br /&gt;
Hattie at MotherPie&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one I carry in my pocket or purse constantly: PowerShot SD20 Digital Elph, Canon.  Can&#8217;t go wrong w/ that one.  Also have another one for more powerful shots but the Canon Elph is too convenient.<br />
Hattie at MotherPie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickV</title>
		<link>http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2006/03/advice_needed_c.html/comment-page-1#comment-5958</link>
		<dc:creator>NickV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s54748.gridserver.com/baby/2006/03/advice-needed-compact-digital-cameras.html#comment-5958</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Pentax Optio S6&lt;br /&gt;
* Actually fits in an Altoids case without modification. Though, we&#039;ve lined it with paper to prevent metal-on-metal scratching.&lt;br /&gt;
* Has a &#039;Pet&#039; mode where it focuses on the thing in the picture that is moving. I&#039;m assuming it&#039;d work just as well for a baby.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pentax Optio S6<br />
* Actually fits in an Altoids case without modification. Though, we&#8217;ve lined it with paper to prevent metal-on-metal scratching.<br />
* Has a &#8216;Pet&#8217; mode where it focuses on the thing in the picture that is moving. I&#8217;m assuming it&#8217;d work just as well for a baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.thingamababy.com/baby/2006/03/advice_needed_c.html/comment-page-1#comment-5957</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s54748.gridserver.com/baby/2006/03/advice-needed-compact-digital-cameras.html#comment-5957</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt; It going to be tough explaining to my son that he wasnt the most ugly kid in the contest. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The more difficult part to explain is why I submitted him in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> It going to be tough explaining to my son that he wasnt the most ugly kid in the contest. </p>
<p>The more difficult part to explain is why I submitted him in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
